Levitra pharmacy online
Levitra pharmacy online
What i should buy with levitra
Open enrollment for what i should buy with levitra 2022 individual/family health coverage began on November 1. The enrollment window is longer this year, continuing until at least January 15 in nearly every what i should buy with levitra state. (For now, Idaho still plans to end the open enrollment period on December 15.)The longer open enrollment period does give people some extra wiggle room during the busy holiday season.
But for most people, December 15 is still the soft deadline youâre what i should buy with levitra going to want to keep in mind. In most states, thatâs the last day you can enroll in coverage that will take effect January 1. Which states have open enrollment dates past December 15 â but still have January what i should buy with levitra 1 effective dates?.
There are some exceptions, however. The following state-run exchanges are giving people extra time to sign up for a plan that takes effect what i should buy with levitra January 1. But in the rest of the country, you need to enroll by December 15 to have your plan start on January 1.
And thatâs important for what i should buy with levitra several reasons.1. Currently uninsured?. Delaying your enrollment will mean no coverage in January.If youâre not already enrolled in ACA-compliant coverage in 2021, the current open enrollment period is your chance to change that for 2022.But if you wait until what i should buy with levitra the last minute to enroll, you wonât have coverage in place when the new year begins.
Instead, youâll be waiting until February 1 â or March 1 â if you enroll at the last minute in a few states with longer enrollment windows.2. Currently uninsured what i should buy with levitra or enrolled in a non-marketplace plan?. Delayed enrollment might mean missing out on free money.If you considered marketplace coverage in the past and found it to be unaffordable, you might currently be uninsured or enrolled in a plan that isnât regulated by the ACA.
Or you might have opted to buy ACA-compliant coverage outside the exchange, if you werenât eligible for what i should buy with levitra premium tax credits (subsidies) the last time you looked.But thanks to the American Rescue Plan, many people who werenât eligible for subsidies in previous years will find that they are now. Those subsidies are only available if youâre enrolled in a marketplace/exchange plan, and the current open enrollment period is your chance to make the switch to a marketplace plan.In addition to being more widely available, premium subsidies are also larger than they were last fall. People who didnât enroll last year due to the cost may find that coverage now fits in their budget.Four out of five people shopping what i should buy with levitra for coverage in the 33 states that use the federally-run marketplace (HealthCare.gov) will find that they can get coverage for $10/month or less.
And millions of uninsured Americans are eligible for premium-free coverage in the marketplace, but may not realize this.Waiting until the last minute to enroll in coverage will mean that you leave all that money on the table for January. You can use our subsidy calculator what i should buy with levitra to get an idea of how much your subsidy will be for 2022. Then, make sure you enroll by December 15 so that youâre eligible to claim the subsidy for all 12 months of the year.3.
Letting your plan what i should buy with levitra auto-renew?. You might be in for a surprise.If you already have coverage through the marketplace in 2021 and are planning to just let it auto-renew for 2021, you might wake up on January 1 with coverage and a premium that arenât what you expected.Even if youâre 100% happy with the plan you have now, you owe it to yourself to spend at least a little time checking out the available options before December 15. The premium that your insurer what i should buy with levitra charges is likely changing for 2022.
And your subsidy amount might also be changing, especially if there are new insurers joining the marketplace in your area.Your insurer might also be making changes to your benefits, provider network, or covered drug list â or even discontinuing the plan altogether and replacing it with a new one. In short, the plan and price you have on January 1 might be quite different from what you have now.This is part of the reason HHS opted to extend the open enrollment what i should buy with levitra period â in order to give people a chance for a âdo-overâ if their auto-renewed plan isnât what they expected. In nearly every state, youâll have until at least January 15 to pick a new plan.
But that what i should buy with levitra plan selection wonât be retroactive to January 1.4. Out-of-pocket expenses wonât transfer in February or March.What if youâre enrolled in a marketplace plan in 2021, let it auto-renew for 2022, and then decide after December 15 that youâd rather have a different plan?. Thanks to the extended open enrollment what i should buy with levitra period, you can do that, and your new plan will take effect in February (or potentially March, if youâre in one of the state-run exchanges with the latest enrollment deadlines).But itâs important to understand that youâll be starting over with a new plan in February or March.
This means the out-of-pocket costs counted against your deductible and out-of-pocket maximum will reset to $0, even if you ended up with out-of-pocket expenses in January.Out-of-pocket expenses reset to $0 on January 1 for all marketplace plans, so your auto-renewed policy will start over with a new deductible at that point. But if you need medical care in January (and have associated out-of-pocket costs) before your new plan takes effect in February, youâll potentially have a higher out-of-pocket exposure for the whole year than you would have if youâd picked your new plan by December 15 and had it start January 1.All of this is a reminder that while most enrollees have until at least mid-January to sign up for 2022 coverage, itâs in what i should buy with levitra your best interest to get your plan selection sorted out by December 15.Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org.
Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.For millions of Americans, the open enrollment period (OEP) to shop for 2022 ACA-compliant coverage will what i should buy with levitra be unlike any of the previous eight OEPs. The reason?. These consumers will â for the first time â be able to tap into the Affordable Care Actâs premium tax credits (more commonly what i should buy with levitra referred to as health insurance subsidies).Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, consumers who in previous years might have found themselves outside the eligible level for subsidies â or who may have found that subsidy amounts were so low as to not be enticing â are now among those eligible for premium tax credits.
So if you havenât shopped for health insurance lately, you might be surprised to see how affordable your health coverage options are this fall (starting November 1), and how many plan options are available in your area.Millions have already tapped into the subsidiesMost people who currently have coverage through the health insurance exchanges have seen improved affordability this year thanks to the American Rescue Plan (ARP). That includes millions of people who were already enrolled in plans when the ARP was enacted last March, as well as millions of others who signed up during the special enrollment what i should buy with levitra period that continued through mid-August in most states (and is still ongoing in some states).Use our updated subsidy calculator to estimate how much you can save on your 2021 health insurance premiums.But there are still millions of others who are either uninsured or have obtained coverage elsewhere. And there are also people who already had coverage in the exchange in 2021 but didnât take the option to switch to a more robust plan after the ARP was implemented.
If youâre in either of these categories, you donât want to miss the open enrollment period in the fall of 2021.The Build Back Better Act, which is still under consideration in Congress, would extend the ARPâs subsidies and ensure that health insurance stays affordable in 2023 and beyond what i should buy with levitra. But even without any new legislative action, most of the ARPâs subsidy enhancements will remain in place for 2022.That means there will continue to be no upper income limit for premium tax credit what i should buy with levitra (subsidy) eligibility, and the percentage of income that people have to pay for the benchmark plan will continue to be lower than it was in prior years. The overall result is that subsidies are larger than they were in the past, and available to more people.Who should make a point to review their subsidy eligibility?.
So who needs to pay close attention what i should buy with levitra this fall, during open enrollment?. In reality, anyone who doesnât have access to Medicare, Medicaid, or an employer-sponsored health plan â because even if youâre already enrolled and happy with the plan you have, auto-renewal is not in your best interest.But there are several groups of people who really need to shop for coverage this fall. Letâs take a look at what each of these groups can expect, and why you shouldnât let open enrollment pass you by if youâre in one of these what i should buy with levitra categories:1.
The uninsured â eligible for low-cost or NO-cost coverageThe majority of uninsured Americans cite the cost of coverage as the reason they donât have health insurance. Yet millions of those individuals are eligible for what i should buy with levitra free or very low-cost health coverage but havenât yet enrolled. This has been the case in prior years as well, but premium-free or very low-cost health plans are even more widely available as a result of the ARP.If youâre uninsured because you donât think health insurance is affordable, know that more than a third of the people who enrolled via HealthCare.gov during the erectile dysfunction treatment/ARP special enrollment period this year purchased plans for less than $10/month.Even if youâve checked in previous years and couldnât afford the plans that were available, youâll want to check again this fall, since the subsidy rules have changed since last year.2.
Consumers enrolled what i should buy with levitra in non-ACA-compliant plansThere are millions of Americans who have purchased health coverage that isnât compliant with the ACA. Most of these plans are either less robust than ACA-compliant plans, or use medical underwriting, or both. They include what i should buy with levitra.
People purchase or keep these plans for a variety of reasons. But chief among them has long been the fact that ACA-compliant coverage was unaffordable â or was assumed to be unaffordable.There are also people who prefer some of the benefits that some of these plans offer (the fellowship of what i should buy with levitra being part of a health care sharing ministry, for instance, or the abundantly available primary care with a DPC membership). But by and large, the reason people choose coverage that isnât ACA-compliant, or that isnât even insurance at all, is because ACA-compliant coverage doesnât fit in their budgets.This has long included a few main groups of people.
Those who earned too much to qualify for subsidies, those affected by the âfamily glitch,â and those who qualified for only minimal subsidy assistance and still felt that the coverage available in the exchange wasnât affordable.(Another group of people unable to afford coverage are those who earn less than the poverty level in 11 states that have refused to expand what i should buy with levitra Medicaid and thus have a coverage gap. Some people in the coverage gap purchase non-ACA-compliant coverage, but this population is also likely to not have any coverage at all. If you or a loved one are in the coverage gap, we encourage you to read this article.)The ARP has what i should buy with levitra not fixed the family glitch or the coverage gap, although there are legislative and administrative solutions under consideration for each of these.But the ARP has addressed the other two issues, and those provisions remain in place for 2022.
The income cap for subsidy eligibility has been eliminated, which means that some applicants can qualify for subsidies with income far above 400% of the poverty level. And for those who were already eligible for subsidies, what i should buy with levitra the subsidy amounts are larger than they used to be, making coverage more affordable.So if you are enrolled in any sort of self-purchased health plan that isnât compliant with the ACA, you owe it to yourself to check your on-exchange options this fall, during the open enrollment period. Keep in mind that you can do that through the exchange, through an enhanced direct enrollment entity, or with the assistance of a health insurance broker.3.
Buyers enrolled in off-exchange health plansThere are also people who have âoff-exchangeâ ACA-compliant plans that theyâve purchased what i should buy with levitra directly from an insurance company, without using the exchange. (Note that this is not the same thing as enrolling in an on-exchange plans through an enhanced direct enrollment entity, many of which are insurance companies).There are a variety of reasons people have chosen to enroll in off-exchange health plans over the last several years. And for some of those enrollees, 2022 might be the year to switch to an on-exchange plan.Since 2018, some people have opted for off-exchange plans if they werenât eligible for premium subsidies and wanted to what i should buy with levitra enroll in a Silver-level plan.
This was a very rational choice, encouraged by state insurance commissioners and marketplaces alike. But if youâve been buying off-exchange coverage in order to get a Silver plan with a lower price tag, the primary point to keep in mind for 2022 is that you might find that youâre now eligible for premium subsidies.Just like the people described above, who have enrolled in various non-ACA-compliant plans in an effort to obtain affordable coverage, the elimination of the income limit for subsidy eligibility is a game changer for people who were buying off-exchange coverage to get a lower price on a Silver plan.Some people what i should buy with levitra have opted for off-exchange coverage because their preferred health insurer wasnât participating in the exchange in their area. This might have been a deciding factor for an applicant who was only eligible for a very small subsidy â or no subsidy at all â and was willing to pay full price for an off-exchange plan from the insurer of their choice.But 2022 is the fourth year in a row with increasing insurer participation in the exchanges, and some big-name insurers are joining or rejoining the exchanges in quite a few states.
So if you what i should buy with levitra havenât checked your on-exchange options in a while, this fall is definitely the time to do so. You might be surprised to see how many options you have, and again, how affordable they are.4. Consumers enrolled in on-exchange plans, but no income details on file and no recent coverage reconsiderationsIf youâre already enrolled in an on-exchange plan and you had given the exchange a projection of your income for 2021, you probably saw your subsidy amount increase at some point this year.But if the exchange didnât have an income on file for you, they wouldnât have been able to activate a subsidy on your behalf (on the HealthCare.gov platform, subsidy amounts were automatically updated in September for people who hadnât updated their accounts by that point, but only if you had provided a what i should buy with levitra projected income to the exchange when you enrolled in coverage for 2021).
And even if your subsidy amount did get updated, you might have remained on the plan you had picked last fall, despite the option to pick a different one after the ARP was enacted.The good news is that youâll be able to claim your full premium tax credit, for the entirety of 2021, when you file your 2021 tax return (assuming you had on-exchange health coverage throughout the year). And during what i should buy with levitra the open enrollment period for 2022 coverage, you can provide income information to the exchange so that a subsidy is paid on your behalf each month next year.Reconsidering your plan choice during open enrollment might end up being beneficial as well. If you didnât qualify for a subsidy in the past, or if you only qualified for a modest subsidy, you might have picked a Bronze plan or even a catastrophic plan, in an effort to keep your monthly premiums affordable.But with the ARP in place, you might find that you can afford a more robust health plan.
And if your income doesnât exceed 250% of the poverty level (and especially if what i should buy with levitra it doesnât exceed 200% of the poverty level), pay close attention to the available Silver plans. The larger subsidies may make it possible for you to afford a Silver plan with built-in cost-sharing reductions that significantly reduce out-of-pocket costs.One other point to keep in mind. If you are receiving a premium subsidy this year, be aware that it might change next what i should buy with levitra year due to a new insurer entering the market in your area and offering lower-priced plans.
Hereâs more about how this works, and what to consider as youâre shopping for coverage this fall.The takeaway point here?. Even what i should buy with levitra if youâve been happy with your plan, you should check your options during open enrollment. This is not the year to let your plan auto-renew.
Be sure youâve provided the exchange with an updated income projection for 2022, and actively compare the plans that are available to you what i should buy with levitra. Itâs possible that a plan with better coverage or a broader provider network might be affordable to you for 2022, even if it was financially out of reach when you checked last fall.Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care what i should buy with levitra Act for healthinsurance.org.
Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts..
Levitra pharmacy online
Levitra |
Valif |
Caverta |
Levitra oral jelly |
Viagra with fluoxetine |
|
Pack price |
40mg |
20mg |
50mg |
||
Australia pharmacy price |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Best way to use |
Pharmacy |
Canadian Pharmacy |
Canadian Pharmacy |
Online Pharmacy |
Indian Pharmacy |
Price |
Order online |
Nearby pharmacy |
At cvs |
RX pharmacy |
At cvs |
Buy with discover card |
20mg 10 tablet $34.95
|
20mg 30 tablet $119.95
|
100mg 12 tablet $89.95
|
$
|
$
|
Buy with credit card |
In online pharmacy |
Register first |
No |
Register first |
Register first |
Until then, you can download read the levitra pharmacy online unpublished PDF version. Although we make a concerted effort to reproduce the original document in full on our Public Inspection pages, in some cases graphics may not be displayed, and non-substantive markup language may appear alongside substantive text. If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register levitra pharmacy online provide legal notice to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C.
1503 &. 1507. Learn more here.Start levitra pharmacy online Preamble Centers for Medicare &. Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
Extension of timeline for publication of final rule. This notice announces an extension of the timeline for publication of a levitra pharmacy online Medicare final rule in accordance with the Social Security Act, which allows us to extend the timeline for publication of the final rule. As of August 26, 2020, the timeline for publication of the final rule to finalize the provisions of the October 17, 2019 proposed rule (84 FR 55766) is extended until August 31, 2021. Start Further Info Lisa O.
Wilson, (410) 786-8852 levitra pharmacy online. End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information In the October 17, 2019 Federal Register (84 FR 55766), we published a proposed rule that addressed undue regulatory impact and burden of the physician self-referral law. The proposed rule was issued in conjunction with the Centers for Medicare &. Medicaid Services' (CMS) Patients over Paperwork initiative and the Department of Health and Human Services' (the Department or levitra pharmacy online HHS) Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care.
In the proposed rule, we proposed exceptions to the physician self-referral law for certain value-based compensation arrangements between or among physicians, providers, and suppliers. A new exception for certain arrangements under which a physician receives limited remuneration for items or services actually provided by the physician. A new exception for donations of cybersecurity technology and related services. And amendments to levitra pharmacy online the existing exception for electronic health records (EHR) items and services.
The proposed rule also provides critically necessary guidance for physicians and health care providers and suppliers whose financial relationships are governed by the physician self-referral statute and regulations. This notice announces an extension of the timeline for publication of the final rule and the continuation of effectiveness of the proposed rule. Section 1871(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires us to establish and publish a regular timeline for levitra pharmacy online the publication of final regulations based on the previous publication of a proposed regulation. In accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the timeline may vary among different regulations based on differences in the complexity of the regulation, the number and scope of comments received, and other relevant factors, but may not be longer than 3 years except under exceptional circumstances.
In addition, in accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may extend the initial targeted publication date of the final regulation if the Secretary, no later than the regulation's previously established proposed publication date, publishes a notice with the new target date, and such notice includes a brief explanation of the justification for the variation. We announced in the Spring 2020 levitra pharmacy online Unified Agenda (June 30, 2020, www.reginfo.gov) that we would issue the final rule in August 2020. However, we are still working through the Start Printed Page 52941complexity of the issues raised by comments received on the proposed rule and therefore we are not able to meet the announced publication target date. This notice extends the timeline for publication of the final rule until August 31, 2021.
Start Signature levitra pharmacy online Dated. August 24, 2020. Wilma M. Robinson, Deputy Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human Services.
End Signature End Supplemental Information [FR Doc. 2020-18867 Filed 8-26-20. 8:45 am]BILLING CODE 4120-01-P.
It is Buy levitra online without prescription scheduled to be published on what i should buy with levitra 09/18/2020. Once it is published it will be available on this page in an official form. Until then, you can download the unpublished PDF version. Although we make a concerted effort to reproduce the original document what i should buy with levitra in full on our Public Inspection pages, in some cases graphics may not be displayed, and non-substantive markup language may appear alongside substantive text.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & what i should buy with levitra. 1507.
Learn more here.Start Preamble Centers for Medicare &. Medicaid Services (CMS), what i should buy with levitra HHS. Extension of timeline for publication of final rule. This notice announces an extension of the timeline for publication of a Medicare final rule in accordance with the Social Security Act, which allows us to extend the timeline for publication of the final rule.
As of August 26, 2020, the timeline what i should buy with levitra for publication of the final rule to finalize the provisions of the October 17, 2019 proposed rule (84 FR 55766) is extended until August 31, 2021. Start Further Info Lisa O. Wilson, (410) 786-8852. End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information In the October 17, 2019 Federal Register (84 FR 55766), we published what i should buy with levitra a proposed rule that addressed undue regulatory impact and burden of the physician self-referral law.
The proposed rule was issued in conjunction with the Centers for Medicare &. Medicaid Services' (CMS) Patients over Paperwork initiative and the Department of Health and Human Services' (the Department or HHS) Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care. In the proposed rule, we proposed exceptions to the physician self-referral law for certain value-based compensation arrangements between or among physicians, providers, and suppliers. A new exception for what i should buy with levitra certain arrangements under which a physician receives limited remuneration for items or services actually provided by the physician.
A new exception for donations of cybersecurity technology and related services. And amendments to the existing exception for electronic health records (EHR) items and services. The proposed rule also provides critically necessary guidance for physicians and what i should buy with levitra health care providers and suppliers whose financial relationships are governed by the physician self-referral statute and regulations. This notice announces an extension of the timeline for publication of the final rule and the continuation of effectiveness of the proposed rule.
Section 1871(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires us to establish and publish a regular timeline for the publication of final regulations based on the previous publication of a proposed regulation. In accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the timeline may vary among different what i should buy with levitra regulations based on differences in the complexity of the regulation, the number and scope of comments received, and other relevant factors, but may not be longer than 3 years except under exceptional circumstances. In addition, in accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may extend the initial targeted publication date of the final regulation if the Secretary, no later than the regulation's previously established proposed publication date, publishes a notice with the new target date, and such notice includes a brief explanation of the justification for the variation. We announced in the Spring 2020 Unified Agenda (June 30, 2020, www.reginfo.gov) that we would issue the final rule in August 2020.
However, we are still working through the Start Printed Page 52941complexity of the issues raised by comments received on the proposed rule and what i should buy with levitra therefore we are not able to meet the announced publication target date. This notice extends the timeline for publication of the final rule until August 31, 2021. Start Signature Dated. August 24, 2020 what i should buy with levitra.
Wilma M. Robinson, Deputy Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human Services. End Signature End Supplemental Information [FR Doc.
What should I tell my health care provider before I take Levitra?
They need to know if you have any of these conditions:
- anatomical deformity of the penis, Peyronie's disease, or ever had an erection that lasted more than 4 hours
- bleeding disorder
- cancer
- diabetes
- frequent heartburn or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- heart disease, angina, high or low blood pressure, a history of heart attack, or other heart problems
- high cholesterol
- HIV
- kidney disease
- liver disease
- sickle cell disease
- stroke
- stomach or intestinal ulcers
- eye or vision problems
- an unusual reaction to vardenafil, medicines, foods, dyes, or preservatives
How to get levitra in the us
NCHS Data how to get levitra in the us Brief No visit the site. 286, September 2017PDF Versionpdf icon (374 KB)Anjel Vahratian, Ph.D.Key findingsData from the National Health Interview Survey, 2015Among those aged 40â59, perimenopausal women (56.0%) were more likely than postmenopausal (40.5%) and premenopausal (32.5%) women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period.Postmenopausal women aged 40â59 were more likely than premenopausal women aged 40â59 to have trouble falling asleep (27.1% compared with 16.8%, respectively), and staying asleep (35.9% compared with 23.7%), four times or more in the past week.Postmenopausal women aged 40â59 (55.1%) were more likely than premenopausal women aged 40â59 (47.0%) to not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week.Sleep duration and quality are important contributors to health and wellness. Insufficient sleep is associated how to get levitra in the us with an increased risk for chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease (1) and diabetes (2). Women may be particularly vulnerable to sleep problems during times of reproductive hormonal change, such as after the menopausal transition. Menopause is âthe permanent cessation of menstruation that occurs after the loss of how to get levitra in the us ovarian activityâ (3).
This data brief describes sleep duration and sleep quality among nonpregnant women aged 40â59 by menopausal status. The age range selected for this analysis reflects the focus on midlife sleep health. In this analysis, 74.2% of women are how to get levitra in the us premenopausal, 3.7% are perimenopausal, and 22.1% are postmenopausal. Keywords. Insufficient sleep, menopause, National Health Interview Survey Perimenopausal women were more likely than premenopausal and postmenopausal women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period.More than one in three nonpregnant women aged 40â59 how to get levitra in the us slept less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period (35.1%) (Figure 1).
Perimenopausal women were most likely to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period (56.0%), compared with 32.5% of premenopausal and 40.5% of postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period. Figure 1 how to get levitra in the us. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who slept less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant quadratic trend by how to get levitra in the us menopausal status (p <.
0.05).NOTES. Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they how to get levitra in the us no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data how to get levitra in the us table for Figure 1pdf icon.SOURCE.
NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. The percentage of women aged 40â59 who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.Nearly one in five nonpregnant women aged 40â59 had trouble falling asleep four times how to get levitra in the us or more in the past week (19.4%) (Figure 2). The percentage of women in this age group who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week increased from 16.8% among premenopausal women to 24.7% among perimenopausal and 27.1% among postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to have trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week. Figure 2 how to get levitra in the us.
Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend by menopausal status (p < how to get levitra in the us. 0.05).NOTES. Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less how to get levitra in the us.
Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data table for Figure 2pdf how to get levitra in the us icon.SOURCE. NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. The percentage of women aged 40â59 who had how to get levitra in the us trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.More than one in four nonpregnant women aged 40â59 had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week (26.7%) (Figure 3). The percentage of women aged 40â59 who had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week increased from 23.7% among premenopausal, to 30.8% among perimenopausal, and to 35.9% among postmenopausal women.
Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to have trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week. Figure 3 how to get levitra in the us. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend by menopausal how to get levitra in the us status (p <. 0.05).NOTES.
Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less how to get levitra in the us. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data table for how to get levitra in the us Figure 3pdf icon.SOURCE. NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015.
The percentage of women aged 40â59 who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.Nearly one in two nonpregnant women aged 40â59 did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week (48.9%) (Figure 4). The percentage of women in this age group who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week increased from 47.0% among premenopausal women to 49.9% among perimenopausal and how to get levitra in the us 55.1% among postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week. Figure 4 how to get levitra in the us. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week, by menopausal status.
United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend by menopausal status (p <. 0.05).NOTES. Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle.
Access data table for Figure 4pdf icon.SOURCE. NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. SummaryThis report describes sleep duration and sleep quality among U.S. Nonpregnant women aged 40â59 by menopausal status. Perimenopausal women were most likely to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period compared with premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
In contrast, postmenopausal women were most likely to have poor-quality sleep. A greater percentage of postmenopausal women had frequent trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, and not waking well rested compared with premenopausal women. The percentage of perimenopausal women with poor-quality sleep was between the percentages for the other two groups in all three categories. Sleep duration changes with advancing age (4), but sleep duration and quality are also influenced by concurrent changes in womenâs reproductive hormone levels (5). Because sleep is critical for optimal health and well-being (6), the findings in this report highlight areas for further research and targeted health promotion.
DefinitionsMenopausal status. A three-level categorical variable was created from a series of questions that asked women. 1) âHow old were you when your periods or menstrual cycles started?. Â. 2) âDo you still have periods or menstrual cycles?.
Â. 3) âWhen did you have your last period or menstrual cycle?. Â. And 4) âHave you ever had both ovaries removed, either as part of a hysterectomy or as one or more separate surgeries?. Â Women were postmenopausal if they a) had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or b) were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries.
Women were perimenopausal if they a) no longer had a menstrual cycle and b) their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Premenopausal women still had a menstrual cycle.Not waking feeling well rested. Determined by respondents who answered 3 days or less on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, on how many days did you wake up feeling well rested?. ÂShort sleep duration. Determined by respondents who answered 6 hours or less on the questionnaire item asking, âOn average, how many hours of sleep do you get in a 24-hour period?.
ÂTrouble falling asleep. Determined by respondents who answered four times or more on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, how many times did you have trouble falling asleep?. ÂTrouble staying asleep. Determined by respondents who answered four times or more on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, how many times did you have trouble staying asleep?. Â Data source and methodsData from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used for this analysis.
NHIS is a multipurpose health survey conducted continuously throughout the year by the National Center for Health Statistics. Interviews are conducted in person in respondentsâ homes, but follow-ups to complete interviews may be conducted over the telephone. Data for this analysis came from the Sample Adult core and cancer supplement sections of the 2015 NHIS. For more information about NHIS, including the questionnaire, visit the NHIS website.All analyses used weights to produce national estimates. Estimates on sleep duration and quality in this report are nationally representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized nonpregnant female population aged 40â59 living in households across the United States.
The sample design is described in more detail elsewhere (7). Point estimates and their estimated variances were calculated using SUDAAN software (8) to account for the complex sample design of NHIS. Linear and quadratic trend tests of the estimated proportions across menopausal status were tested in SUDAAN via PROC DESCRIPT using the POLY option. Differences between percentages were evaluated using two-sided significance tests at the 0.05 level. About the authorAnjel Vahratian is with the National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health Interview Statistics.
The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Lindsey Black in the preparation of this report. ReferencesFord ES. Habitual sleep duration and predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk using the pooled cohort risk equations among US adults. J Am Heart Assoc 3(6):e001454. 2014.Ford ES, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Li C, Perry GS, Croft JB.
Associations between self-reported sleep duration and sleeping disorder with concentrations of fasting and 2-h glucose, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin among adults without diagnosed diabetes. J Diabetes 6(4):338â50. 2014.American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 141.
Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 123(1):202â16. 2014.Black LI, Nugent CN, Adams PF. Tables of adult health behaviors, sleep. National Health Interview Survey, 2011â2014pdf icon.
2016.Santoro N. Perimenopause. From research to practice. J Womenâs Health (Larchmt) 25(4):332â9. 2016.Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, et al.
Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult. A joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. J Clin Sleep Med 11(6):591â2. 2015.Parsons VL, Moriarity C, Jonas K, et al. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 2006â2015.
National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(165). 2014.RTI International. SUDAAN (Release 11.0.0) [computer software]. 2012.
Suggested citationVahratian A. Sleep duration and quality among women aged 40â59, by menopausal status. NCHS data brief, no 286. Hyattsville, MD. National Center for Health Statistics.
2017.Copyright informationAll material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission. Citation as to source, however, is appreciated.National Center for Health StatisticsCharles J. Rothwell, M.S., M.B.A., DirectorJennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate Director for ScienceDivision of Health Interview StatisticsMarcie L. Cynamon, DirectorStephen J.
Blumberg, Ph.D., Associate Director for Science.
NCHS Data what i should buy with levitra Brief https://www.wolf-garten.com/viagra-discount No. 286, September 2017PDF Versionpdf icon (374 KB)Anjel Vahratian, Ph.D.Key findingsData from the National Health Interview Survey, 2015Among those aged 40â59, perimenopausal women (56.0%) were more likely than postmenopausal (40.5%) and premenopausal (32.5%) women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period.Postmenopausal women aged 40â59 were more likely than premenopausal women aged 40â59 to have trouble falling asleep (27.1% compared with 16.8%, respectively), and staying asleep (35.9% compared with 23.7%), four times or more in the past week.Postmenopausal women aged 40â59 (55.1%) were more likely than premenopausal women aged 40â59 (47.0%) to not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week.Sleep duration and quality are important contributors to health and wellness. Insufficient sleep is associated with an increased risk for chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease what i should buy with levitra (1) and diabetes (2). Women may be particularly vulnerable to sleep problems during times of reproductive hormonal change, such as after the menopausal transition.
Menopause is âthe what i should buy with levitra permanent cessation of menstruation that occurs after the loss of ovarian activityâ (3). This data brief describes sleep duration and sleep quality among nonpregnant women aged 40â59 by menopausal status. The age range selected for this analysis reflects the focus on midlife sleep health. In this analysis, 74.2% of women are premenopausal, 3.7% are perimenopausal, and 22.1% are postmenopausal what i should buy with levitra.
Keywords. Insufficient sleep, menopause, National Health Interview Survey Perimenopausal women were more likely than premenopausal and postmenopausal women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period.More than one in three what i should buy with levitra nonpregnant women aged 40â59 slept less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period (35.1%) (Figure 1). Perimenopausal women were most likely to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period (56.0%), compared with 32.5% of premenopausal and 40.5% of postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period.
Figure 1 what i should buy with levitra. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who slept less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image what i should buy with levitra icon1Significant quadratic trend by menopausal status (p <. 0.05).NOTES.
Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago what i should buy with levitra or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data what i should buy with levitra table for Figure 1pdf icon.SOURCE.
NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. The percentage of what i should buy with levitra women aged 40â59 who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.Nearly one in five nonpregnant women aged 40â59 had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week (19.4%) (Figure 2). The percentage of women in this age group who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week increased from 16.8% among premenopausal women to 24.7% among perimenopausal and 27.1% among postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to have trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week.
Figure 2 what i should buy with levitra. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who had trouble falling asleep four times or more in the past week, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend what i should buy with levitra by menopausal status (p <. 0.05).NOTES.
Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if what i should buy with levitra they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data table what i should buy with levitra for Figure 2pdf icon.SOURCE.
NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. The percentage of women aged 40â59 who had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.More than one in four nonpregnant women aged 40â59 had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week (26.7%) (Figure 3) what i should buy with levitra. The percentage of women aged 40â59 who had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week increased from 23.7% among premenopausal, to 30.8% among perimenopausal, and to 35.9% among postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to have trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week.
Figure 3 what i should buy with levitra. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who had trouble staying asleep four times or more in the past week, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend what i should buy with levitra by menopausal status (p <. 0.05).NOTES.
Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no what i should buy with levitra longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data table what i should buy with levitra for Figure 3pdf icon.SOURCE.
NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. The percentage of women aged 40â59 who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week varied by menopausal status.Nearly one in two nonpregnant women aged 40â59 did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week (48.9%) (Figure 4). The percentage of women in this age group who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week increased from 47.0% among what i should buy with levitra premenopausal women to 49.9% among perimenopausal and 55.1% among postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were significantly more likely than premenopausal women to not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week.
Figure 4 what i should buy with levitra. Percentage of nonpregnant women aged 40â59 who did not wake up feeling well rested 4 days or more in the past week, by menopausal status. United States, 2015image icon1Significant linear trend by menopausal status (p <. 0.05).NOTES.
Women were postmenopausal if they had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they no longer had a menstrual cycle and their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less. Women were premenopausal if they still had a menstrual cycle. Access data table for Figure 4pdf icon.SOURCE.
NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2015. SummaryThis report describes sleep duration and sleep quality among U.S. Nonpregnant women aged 40â59 by menopausal status. Perimenopausal women were most likely to sleep less than 7 hours, on average, in a 24-hour period compared with premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
In contrast, postmenopausal women were most likely to have poor-quality sleep. A greater percentage of postmenopausal women had frequent trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, and not waking well rested compared with premenopausal women. The percentage of perimenopausal women with poor-quality sleep was between the percentages for the other two groups in all three categories. Sleep duration changes with advancing age (4), but sleep duration and quality are also influenced by concurrent changes in womenâs reproductive hormone levels (5).
Because sleep is critical for optimal health and well-being (6), the findings in this report highlight areas for further research and targeted health promotion. DefinitionsMenopausal status. A three-level categorical variable was created from a series of questions that asked women. 1) âHow old were you when your periods or menstrual cycles started?.
Â. 2) âDo you still have periods or menstrual cycles?. Â. 3) âWhen did you have your last period or menstrual cycle?.
Â. And 4) âHave you ever had both ovaries removed, either as part of a hysterectomy or as one or more separate surgeries?. Â Women were postmenopausal if they a) had gone without a menstrual cycle for more than 1 year or b) were in surgical menopause after the removal of their ovaries. Women were perimenopausal if they a) no longer had a menstrual cycle and b) their last menstrual cycle was 1 year ago or less.
Premenopausal women still had a menstrual cycle.Not waking feeling well rested. Determined by respondents who answered 3 days or less on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, on how many days did you wake up feeling well rested?. ÂShort sleep duration. Determined by respondents who answered 6 hours or less on the questionnaire item asking, âOn average, how many hours of sleep do you get in a 24-hour period?.
ÂTrouble falling asleep. Determined by respondents who answered four times or more on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, how many times did you have trouble falling asleep?. ÂTrouble staying asleep. Determined by respondents who answered four times or more on the questionnaire item asking, âIn the past week, how many times did you have trouble staying asleep?.
 Data source and methodsData from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used for this analysis. NHIS is a multipurpose health survey conducted continuously throughout the year by the National Center for Health Statistics. Interviews are conducted in person in respondentsâ homes, but follow-ups to complete interviews may be conducted over the telephone. Data for this analysis came from the Sample Adult core and cancer supplement sections of the 2015 NHIS.
For more information about NHIS, including the questionnaire, visit the NHIS website.All analyses used weights to produce national estimates. Estimates on sleep duration and quality in this report are nationally representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized nonpregnant female population aged 40â59 living in households across the United States. The sample design is described in more detail elsewhere (7). Point estimates and their estimated variances were calculated using SUDAAN software (8) to account for the complex sample design of NHIS.
Linear and quadratic trend tests of the estimated proportions across menopausal status were tested in SUDAAN via PROC DESCRIPT using the POLY option. Differences between percentages were evaluated using two-sided significance tests at the 0.05 level. About the authorAnjel Vahratian is with the National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health Interview Statistics. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Lindsey Black in the preparation of this report.
ReferencesFord ES. Habitual sleep duration and predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk using the pooled cohort risk equations among US adults. J Am Heart Assoc 3(6):e001454. 2014.Ford ES, Wheaton AG, Chapman DP, Li C, Perry GS, Croft JB.
Associations between self-reported sleep duration and sleeping disorder with concentrations of fasting and 2-h glucose, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin among adults without diagnosed diabetes. J Diabetes 6(4):338â50. 2014.American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
141. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 123(1):202â16. 2014.Black LI, Nugent CN, Adams PF.
Tables of adult health behaviors, sleep. National Health Interview Survey, 2011â2014pdf icon. 2016.Santoro N. Perimenopause.
From research to practice. J Womenâs Health (Larchmt) 25(4):332â9. 2016.Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult.
A joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. J Clin Sleep Med 11(6):591â2. 2015.Parsons VL, Moriarity C, Jonas K, et al. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 2006â2015.
National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(165). 2014.RTI International. SUDAAN (Release 11.0.0) [computer software].
2012. Suggested citationVahratian A. Sleep duration and quality among women aged 40â59, by menopausal status. NCHS data brief, no 286.
Hyattsville, MD. National Center for Health Statistics. 2017.Copyright informationAll material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission. Citation as to source, however, is appreciated.National Center for Health StatisticsCharles J.
Rothwell, M.S., M.B.A., DirectorJennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate Director for ScienceDivision of Health Interview StatisticsMarcie L. Cynamon, DirectorStephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D., Associate Director for Science.
Levitra coupons free levitra
For the Pfizer-BioNTech erectile dysfunction treatment â now marketed levitra coupons free levitra https://friederichsseed.com/best-place-to-buy-generic-levitra////////////////////// as Comirnaty â full approval by the Food and Drug Administration last month required going through the agencyâs standard review process before being determined safe and effective at preventing the erectile dysfunction. This occurred roughly eight months after the FDA had approved the treatment for emergency use.âWhile millions of people have already safely received erectile dysfunction treatments, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a treatment may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated,â acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a statement.And this status change has made a difference, for some. According to an ABC News analysis, the levitra coupons free levitra U.S.
Saw a 17 percent increase in first-dose vaccinations following the approval. The Pentagon announced that it would mandate vaccination for its 1.4 million active-duty service members, and President Joe Biden announced earlier this month that as many as 100 million Americans working in health care, the federal government and the private sector will also be required to get the shot.But traversing the approval process â from submitting an application levitra coupons free levitra in May to full FDA approval in August â in less than four months is much faster than usual for a new treatment. In fact, Comirnaty is the agency's fastest approval yet.
Under typical circumstances, it aims to review submissions over a 10-month timeline, and even other priority treatments can take between six and eight months levitra coupons free levitra to reach the finish line. Some have pointed to Comirnatyâs speedier approval as evidence of the review process being neglected, so letâs dive into what it takes to get a treatment into arms and how the Pfizer-BioNTech treatment measures up.The Road to FDA ApprovalPre-clinical trials. Long before a treatment is tested in humans, it must show promise in the lab â specifically, in tissue samples and animal models.
Researchers conduct pre-clinical trials to learn levitra coupons free levitra more about how a treatment works and assess whether itâs likely to be safe and effective in further clinical trials.Investigational New Drug application. To begin testing its treatment in people, a company must submit the results of any existing research and pre-clinical testing (as well as information about the manufacturing process) to the FDA. This submission levitra coupons free levitra is called an Investigational New Drug (IND) application and is used by the agency to determine the quality of the treatment and the technology used to manufacture it, as well as whether the research was done according to good laboratory practices.Phase 1 clinical trial.
In a Phase 1 clinical trial, safety is the name of the game. Generally, the treatment candidate is given to 20 to 100 volunteers who have yet to be exposed to the disease levitra coupons free levitra and are otherwise healthy. Researchers study these volunteers to determine whether the treatment rears any unexpected adverse reactions.Phase 2 clinical trial.
In Phase 2, different dosages are given to a larger group of levitra coupons free levitra volunteers â typically hundreds â with various health statuses and of different demographics. Usually, these studies include a control group of volunteers who receive a placebo in place of the treatment candidate. While it does provide additional information about potential side effects, the main goals of this phase are to lock down an optimal dosage and prove that the treatment is effective at generating an immune response.Phase 3 clinical trial.
If all goes well in the first two phases, the treatment or placebo is generally given to thousands of volunteers to gather levitra coupons free levitra even more information on its safety and efficacy.Biologics License Application. The final step in reaching FDA approval requires companies to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) â which, like the IND application, includes pre-clinical data and details of the manufacturing process but also requires six months of clinical data proving that a treatment is safe and effective â for review. A typical FDA review team is comprised of âphysicians, chemists, statisticians, pharmacologists, toxicologists, microbiologists, experts in postmarketing safety, clinical study site inspectors, manufacturing and facility inspectors, and labeling and communications experts,â according to the the agency's webpage levitra coupons free levitra on treatment development.
Phase 4 clinical trial. Even after a treatment is approved for use, long-term clinical studies, often called Phase 4 clinical trials, are conducted to better understand the risks and potential benefits of the levitra coupons free levitra treatment over a timespan of years. Trial, Trial, Trial AgainPfizer and BioNTech expedited this process by basing their trial decisions on preliminary results from previous ones â and even, occasionally, from trials that were still underway.
In other words, trials overlapped and evolved almost seamlessly from Phase 1 to Phase levitra coupons free levitra 2 to Phase 3 (leading to comprehensive conglomerates identified as Phase 1/2 and Phase 2/3). This adaptive trial design, while efficient, required a great deal of advanced planning and involved a lot of risk. If a treatment performed poorly and had to be withdrawn, it would have involved shutting down multiple trials as opposed to just one.In Phase 1/2, over 360 healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 85 received one of four potential treatment candidates.
The trial was designed to study both safety and levitra coupons free levitra the relationship between dosages and immune response simultaneously. During this trial, the FDA granted fast track designation to two candidates based on preliminary data â one of which, BNT162b2, was later selected as the lead candidate and moved on to Phase 2/3. The designation meant that the agency continuously looked at clinical trial data as it came in, rather than beginning after the submission of a levitra coupons free levitra BLA, shortening the amount of time it took to review that data this summer.Approximately 43,000 volunteers participated in Phase 2/3, half of whom were given the treatment and half of whom were given a placebo.
At the time the treatment was awarded emergency use authorization, Pfizer and BioNTech reported 170 confirmed cases (162 of which occurred within the placebo group) and an efficacy of 95 percent from the ongoing trial. More than half of the volunteers continued to be studied for at least four months after their second dose, and when it came time to levitra coupons free levitra approve the treatment, almost 12,000 participants had been followed for at least six months. Among this group, a 91 percent efficacy was reported.
"...Although we approved this treatment expeditiously, it was fully in keeping with our levitra coupons free levitra existing high standards for treatments in the U.S.," Peter Marks, director of the FDAâs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. Even after the treatment received full approval, many of those in the trial will continue to be followed for up to two years, as part of a Phase 4 trial that wonât be complete until early 2022 or later.No Newcomer to CriticismThe FDA has concluded that the trials conducted by Pfizer and BioNTech delivered the answers needed to approve the treatment, but the fact that trials will continue well into 2022 is one reason some have argued against its approval.A group of scientists led by Linda Wastila, a professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland, recently called for the agency to slow down â citing remaining unknowns about safety and effectiveness. ÂIf the FDA listens to us, they wonât give serious consideration to approving a erectile dysfunction treatment until 2022,â the group said.To be sure, the road to FDA approval often includes rough terrain and the agency is no newcomer to criticism.
Earlier this year, the FDA again made headlines when it ignored disparaging clinical trial data and levitra coupons free levitra the advice of an independent panel of experts, instead opting to green-light the first new drug for Alzheimerâs disease in 18 years. Aducanumab, developed by the company Biogen. Three members of the FDAâs advisory panel resigned in protest.And in the late levitra coupons free levitra 1980s, HIV activist organizations accused the agency of unnecessarily delaying the approval of medications to fight HIV.
Louis Lasagna, then chairman of a presidential advisory panel, estimated in 1990 that thousands of lives were lost each year because of delays in approval and marketing of the drugs.Moving forward, there is plenty more controversy to go around. For now, there remains debate over the approval of a levitra coupons free levitra erectile dysfunction treatment for children ages 5 to 11. Pfizer and BioNTech have recently submitted preliminary clinical data to the FDA as part of that process.
And the FDAâs recent authorization of booster shots only for those 65 and older and at high risk of severe is in line with the recommendation of an outside advisory panel â but at odds with Bidenâs plan to roll out booster shots for all adults.If only one thing is certain, it is that the agency, much like the erectile dysfunction itself, will remain in the headlines for the foreseeable future..
For the Pfizer-BioNTech erectile dysfunction treatment â now marketed as Comirnaty what i should buy with levitra â full approval by the Food and Drug Administration last month required going through the agencyâs standard https://friederichsseed.com/best-place-to-buy-generic-levitra////////////////////// review process before being determined safe and effective at preventing the erectile dysfunction. This occurred roughly eight months after the FDA had approved the treatment for emergency use.âWhile millions of people have already safely received erectile dysfunction treatments, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a treatment may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated,â acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said in a statement.And this status change has made a difference, for some. According to an ABC what i should buy with levitra News analysis, the U.S. Saw a 17 percent increase in first-dose vaccinations following the approval. The Pentagon announced that it would mandate vaccination for its 1.4 million active-duty service members, and President Joe Biden announced earlier this month that as many as 100 million Americans working in health care, the federal government and the private sector will also be required to get the shot.But traversing the approval process â from submitting an application in May to full FDA approval in August â in less than four what i should buy with levitra months is much faster than usual for a new treatment.
In fact, Comirnaty is the agency's fastest approval yet. Under typical what i should buy with levitra circumstances, it aims to review submissions over a 10-month timeline, and even other priority treatments can take between six and eight months to reach the finish line. Some have pointed to Comirnatyâs speedier approval as evidence of the review process being neglected, so letâs dive into what it takes to get a treatment into arms and how the Pfizer-BioNTech treatment measures up.The Road to FDA ApprovalPre-clinical trials. Long before a treatment is tested in humans, it must show promise in the lab â specifically, in tissue samples and animal models. Researchers conduct what i should buy with levitra pre-clinical trials to learn more about how a treatment works and assess whether itâs likely to be safe and effective in further clinical trials.Investigational New Drug application.
To begin testing its treatment in people, a company must submit the results of any existing research and pre-clinical testing (as well as information about the manufacturing process) to the FDA. This submission is called an Investigational New Drug (IND) application and is used by the what i should buy with levitra agency to determine the quality of the treatment and the technology used to manufacture it, as well as whether the research was done according to good laboratory practices.Phase 1 clinical trial. In a Phase 1 clinical trial, safety is the name of the game. Generally, the treatment candidate is given to 20 to 100 volunteers who have yet to what i should buy with levitra be exposed to the disease and are otherwise healthy. Researchers study these volunteers to determine whether the treatment rears any unexpected adverse reactions.Phase 2 clinical trial.
In Phase 2, different dosages are given to a larger group of volunteers what i should buy with levitra â typically hundreds â with various health statuses and of different demographics. Usually, these studies include a control group of volunteers who receive a placebo in place of the treatment candidate. While it does provide additional information about potential side effects, the main goals of this phase are to lock down an optimal dosage and prove that the treatment is effective at generating an immune response.Phase 3 clinical trial. If all goes well in the first what i should buy with levitra two phases, the treatment or placebo is generally given to thousands of volunteers to gather even more information on its safety and efficacy.Biologics License Application. The final step in reaching FDA approval requires companies to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) â which, like the IND application, includes pre-clinical data and details of the manufacturing process but also requires six months of clinical data proving that a treatment is safe and effective â for review.
A typical FDA review team is comprised of âphysicians, chemists, statisticians, pharmacologists, toxicologists, microbiologists, experts in postmarketing safety, clinical study site inspectors, manufacturing and facility inspectors, and labeling and communications experts,â according what i should buy with levitra to the the agency's webpage on treatment development. Phase 4 clinical trial. Even after a treatment is approved for what i should buy with levitra use, long-term clinical studies, often called Phase 4 clinical trials, are conducted to better understand the risks and potential benefits of the treatment over a timespan of years. Trial, Trial, Trial AgainPfizer and BioNTech expedited this process by basing their trial decisions on preliminary results from previous ones â and even, occasionally, from trials that were still underway. In other words, trials overlapped and evolved almost seamlessly from Phase 1 to Phase 2 to Phase 3 (leading to comprehensive conglomerates identified what i should buy with levitra as Phase 1/2 and Phase 2/3).
This adaptive trial design, while efficient, required a great deal of advanced planning and involved a lot of risk. If a treatment performed poorly and had to be withdrawn, it would have involved shutting down multiple trials as opposed to just one.In Phase 1/2, over 360 healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 85 received one of four potential treatment candidates. The trial was designed to study both safety and the relationship between dosages and immune response simultaneously what i should buy with levitra. During this trial, the FDA granted fast track designation to two candidates based on preliminary data â one of which, BNT162b2, was later selected as the lead candidate and moved on to Phase 2/3. The designation meant that the agency continuously looked at clinical trial data as it came in, rather than beginning after the submission of a BLA, shortening the amount of time it what i should buy with levitra took to review that data this summer.Approximately 43,000 volunteers participated in Phase 2/3, half of whom were given the treatment and half of whom were given a placebo.
At the time the treatment was awarded emergency use authorization, Pfizer and BioNTech reported 170 confirmed cases (162 of which occurred within the placebo group) and an efficacy of 95 percent from the ongoing trial. More than half of the volunteers continued to be studied what i should buy with levitra for at least four months after their second dose, and when it came time to approve the treatment, almost 12,000 participants had been followed for at least six months. Among this group, a 91 percent efficacy was reported. "...Although we approved this what i should buy with levitra treatment expeditiously, it was fully in keeping with our existing high standards for treatments in the U.S.," Peter Marks, director of the FDAâs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. Even after the treatment received full approval, many of those in the trial will continue to be followed for up to two years, as part of a Phase 4 trial that wonât be complete until early 2022 or later.No Newcomer to CriticismThe FDA has concluded that the trials conducted by Pfizer and BioNTech delivered the answers needed to approve the treatment, but the fact that trials will continue well into 2022 is one reason some have argued against its approval.A group of scientists led by Linda Wastila, a professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland, recently called for the agency to slow down â citing remaining unknowns about safety and effectiveness.
ÂIf the FDA listens to us, they wonât give serious consideration to approving a erectile dysfunction treatment until 2022,â the group said.To be sure, the road to FDA approval often includes rough terrain and the agency is no newcomer to criticism. Earlier this year, the FDA again made headlines what i should buy with levitra when it ignored disparaging clinical trial data and the advice of an independent panel of experts, instead opting to green-light the first new drug for Alzheimerâs disease in 18 years. Aducanumab, developed by the company Biogen. Three members of the FDAâs advisory panel resigned in protest.And in the late 1980s, HIV activist organizations accused the agency of unnecessarily delaying the approval of medications to fight what i should buy with levitra HIV. Louis Lasagna, then chairman of a presidential advisory panel, estimated in 1990 that thousands of lives were lost each year because of delays in approval and marketing of the drugs.Moving forward, there is plenty more controversy to go around.
For now, there remains debate over the approval of a erectile dysfunction treatment for children what i should buy with levitra ages 5 to 11. Pfizer and BioNTech have recently submitted preliminary clinical data to the FDA as part of that process. And the FDAâs recent authorization of booster shots only for those 65 and older and at high risk of severe is in line with the recommendation of an outside advisory panel â but at odds with Bidenâs plan to roll out booster shots for all adults.If only one thing is certain, it is that the agency, much like the erectile dysfunction itself, will remain in the headlines for the foreseeable future..
How long does levitra last 10mg
30px auto how long does levitra last 10mg http://ravenwoodforestarts.com/?page_id=150. Max-width. 510px.
5px solid #121212. Border-bottom. 2px solid #121212.
Padding. 5px 0 10px 0. } @media only screen and (min-width.
600px) { #styln-briefing-block { margin. 40px auto. } } #styln-briefing-block a { color.
#121212. } #styln-briefing-block ul { margin-left. 15px.
} #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link { color. #121212. Border-bottom.
Line-height. 1.375rem. } #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link:hover { border-bottom.
None. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet::before { content. 'â¢'.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet:not(:last-child) { margin-bottom. 0.75em. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header-section { margin-bottom.
16px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { font-weight. 700.
Margin-bottom. 5px. } @media only screen and (min-width.
600px) { #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { font-size. 1.25rem. Line-height.
1.5625rem. } } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header a { text-decoration. None.
Color. #333. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header a::after { content.
5px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer { font-size. 14px.
*/ } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-briefinglinks a { font-weight. Bold. Margin-right.
6px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer a { border-bottom. 1px solid #ccc.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer a:hover { border-bottom. 1px solid transparent. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { border-bottom.
None. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-lb-items { display. Grid.
Grid-template-columns. Auto 1fr. Grid-column-gap.
Line-height. 1.2. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time a { color.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time.active a { color. #D0021B. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer-meta { display.
Align-items. Center. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-ts { color.
Display. Block. } @media only screen and (min-width.
600px) { #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link { font-size. 1.0625rem. Line-height.
1.5rem. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet::before { content. 'â¢'.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time a { font-size. 13px. } } @media only screen and (min-width.
1024px) { #styln-briefing-block { width. 100%. } } Latest Updates.
The erectile dysfunction Outbreak 38m ago Argentina, which had early success in controlling the levitra, reports its millionth case. 2h ago A third surge of erectile dysfunction s has now firmly taken hold across much of the United States. 2h ago All 62 residents of a Kansas nursing home caught the levitra in two weeks.
See more updates More live coverage. Markets A New York Times database has tracked clusters of at least 50 erectile dysfunction cases in a dozen rural jails in Montana, Idaho, Utah and New Mexico during the levitra. Among them.
The Purgatory Correctional Center in Hurricane, Utah, with 166 s. The jail in Twin Falls, Idaho, with 279. And, in New Mexico, the Cibola County Correctional Center, which has reported 357 cases.In Cascade County, s at the jail make up about a quarter of all known levitra cases in the county.
Health authorities say that the jailâs outbreak, which began in mid-August, was not believed to be the main cause of the communityâs recent surge, but that it had led to some cases. In the past two months, Mr. Krogue said, the jail released 29 people who were considered actively infected.s at the jail make up about a quarter of Cascade Countyâs known levitra cases.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesGreat Falls, home to about 58,000 residents, is in the less mountainous part of Montana, with the Missouri River flowing through and a large oil refinery on its banks.
The Cascade County Detention Center sits along a highway at the edge of town. Drive five miles in any direction and you are surrounded by wide-open plains.Montana requires that masks be worn inside businesses and indoor public spaces, and many people in Great Falls wear them when walking around downtownâs Central Avenue, where shops and cafes are still recovering from shutting down in the spring. Others go without masks, citing the open space and lack of crowds.Bob Kelly, the mayor, said people had not been overly worried about how the jail outbreak might affect the rest of town when it started.âI think that by the very definition of a jail, hopefully, the disease will be incarcerated, as well as the patients,â he said.
ÂIs there concern?. Sure, thereâs concern. But is there overreaction?.
No.âThe mayor of Great Falls said that residents had considered the jailâs outbreak a distant concern at first.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesSome residentsâ nonchalance about the risks of the levitra, said Mr. Krogue, the jailâs medical director, can be traced to a spring and early summer when almost no one in Cascade County knew anyone who had been sickened.âWe benefited from that early on,â he said. ÂBut in some ways, I think it did us a disservice, too, because it also created a certain level of complacency.âThat has quickly shifted now, he said, as cases have spiked.The number of active cases known to county officials on any given day has risen sharply to about 600, according to Trisha Gardner, Cascade Countyâs health officer.
The county has seen 1,261 cases and six deaths during the levitra, a Times database shows. Some of the cases have been tied to the jail outbreak, she said, and others have been connected to bars and restaurants. Even figuring out what has led to some cases has been complex, she said, as residents have been reluctant to cooperate with contact tracers.âOur hospitals are at capacity, our public health system is at capacity,â she said.
ÂItâs not sustainable at this rate.âWhen the outbreak at the jail began, social distancing was impossible, the authorities said. Three inmates shared cells designed for two. At night, men slept on thin blue pads in every available space.
On the floor in the day room, in shower stalls, in stairwells, in hallways outside of cells.Inmates did not receive masks until August, and jail officials said many have refused to wear them.In interviews with more than a dozen inmates and their family members, inmates described the jail during the outbreak as chaotic and unsanitary. They said their pleas for help often went unanswered by nurses and guards.Newly arriving inmates were not always quarantined from one another before their test results were known because of a lack of space, inmates and jail officials said.Owen Hawley, 30, said every inmate in his living area of 38 men had tested positive for the levitra. He said he had been unable to eat for three days, had intensive body aches and suffered from a headache so powerful it felt as if it was âbehind my eyes.ââAfter the fourth day of like, not eating and stuff, I just shut off, you know?.
 he said.A jail area set aside for quarantining new inmates.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesAt one point, Mr. Hawley said, he and other prisoners protested the way the levitra was being handled by refusing to leave their living areas and by blocking new inmates from entering. Everyone was ultimately tested, Mr.
Hawley said, and each prisoner was given a disposable mask.Sierra Jasmine Wells, 25, another inmate, said women in her dormitory had grown ill, one after the next.âEveryone around me was getting sick and it was tough on me,â she said. ÂBy then, I had already accepted the fact that I was going to get sick.âWhen she became infected, she said, she was given cough syrup and Tylenol.âI kind of was just left alone to deal with it,â she said.Jesse Slaughter, the county sheriff who oversees the jail, said that the jailâs medical staff was doing everything it could, and that he had been seeking health care assistance from other counties. Officials defended their handling of the outbreak, noting that all inmates received standard medications including Tylenol twice a day and were taken to area hospitals when they needed added care.
Seven inmates, as well as some staff members, were hospitalized. No one from the jail has died from the levitra, officials said.Sheriff Jesse Slaughter, who oversees the jail, said he had been seeking health care assistance from other counties.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesMr. Krogue said that since the start of the outbreak he had been working up to 16 hours each day and sleeping in his basement, away from his wife and children.
He remains healthy but says he fears bringing the levitra home. The levitra has slowed some in the jail, and officials have moved some inmates to other facilities, but other prisons and jails in the state are now seeing outbreaks.âYou can start to see what some of these other places experienced much earlier on, and we just didnât have that experience, but itâs certainly happening now,â Mr. Krogue said.
ÂItâs just real in a way that it wasnât.âLucy Tompkins reported from Great Falls, Maura Turcotte from Chicago and Libby Seline from Lincoln, Neb. Reporting was contributed by Izzy Colón from Columbia, Mo., Brendon Derr from Phoenix, Rebecca Griesbach from Tuscaloosa, Ala., Danya Issawi and Timothy Williams from New York, Ann Hinga Klein from Des Moines, K.B. Mensah from Silver Spring, Md., and Mitch Smith from Chicago.Start Preamble Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
Notice of funding opportunity. The erectile dysfunction Disease 2019 (erectile dysfunction treatment) public health emergency Start Printed Page 63654has had a significant impact on transit operations. During a series of FTA listening sessions held over the last three months, transit agencies asked FTA to support research to identify solutions to address the operational challenges that they are facing as a result of erectile dysfunction treatment.
In response, FTA makes available through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) funding to support research demonstration grants to public transit agencies to develop, deploy, and demonstrate innovative solutions that improve the operational efficiency of transit agencies, as well as enhance the mobility of transit users affected by the erectile dysfunction treatment public health emergency. Demonstration grants under this NOFO are authorized under FTA's Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C. 5312).
Eligible projects will demonstrate innovative solutions to improve the operational efficiencies of transit systems and enhance mobility for their communities in four major areas. (1) Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis. (2) exposure mitigation measures.
(3) innovative mobility such as contactless payments. And (4) measures that strengthen public confidence in transit services. The total funding available for awards under this NOFO is $10,000,000.
FTA may supplement this amount if additional funding becomes available. Applicants must submit completed proposals for funding opportunity FTA-2020-015-TRI through the GRANTS.GOV âAPPLYâ function by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 2, 2020.
Prospective applicants should register as soon as possible on the GRANTS.GOV website to ensure they can complete the application process before the submission deadline. Application instructions are available on FTA's website at http://transit.dot.gov/âhowtoapply and in the âFINDâ module of GRANTS.GOV. FTA will not accept mail and fax submissions.
Start Further Info Please send any questions on this notice to Jamel El-Hamri email. Jamel.El-Hamri@dot.gov phone. 2020-366-8985.
A Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at 1-800-877-8339. End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information Table of Contents A. Program Description B.
Federal Award Information C. Eligibility Information D. Application and Submission Information E.
Application Review Information F. Federal Award Administration Information G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact Information A.
Program Description The Public Transportation erectile dysfunction treatment Research Demonstration Grant Program is funded through the Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C. 5312), with the goal to develop, deploy, and demonstrate innovative solutions that improve the operational efficiency of transit agencies, as well as enhance the mobility of transit users affected by the erectile dysfunction treatment public health emergency. Eligible projects will propose to develop and deploy innovative solutions in four major areas.
(1) Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis. (2) exposure mitigation measures. (3) innovative mobility such as contactless payments.
And (4) measures that strengthen public confidence in transit. As required by 49 U.S.C. 5312(e)(4), projects funded under this NOFO must participate in an evaluation by an independent outside entity that will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the success or failure of the projects funded under this subsection and any plan for broad-based implementation of the innovation promoted by successful projects.
B. Federal Award Information FTA makes available $10,000,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funds under the Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C. 5312) to finance the Public Transportation erectile dysfunction treatment Research Demonstration Grant Program.
FTA may supplement the total funds available if additional funding becomes available at the time project selections are made. FTA will grant pre-award authority starting on the date of the project award announcement for selected projects and should be completed within 24 months from the date of award. Funds are available only for eligible expenses incurred after the announcement of project selections.
C. Eligibility Information (1) Eligible Applicants Eligible applicants include State and local governmental authorities, direct recipients of Urbanized Area (49 U.S.C. 5307) and Rural Area (49 U.S.C.
5311) formula funds, and Indian tribes. Eligible applicants are limited to FTA grantees or subrecipients who would be the primary beneficiaries of the innovative products and services that are developedâtypically public transit agencies. Except for projects proposed by Indian tribes, proposals for projects in rural (non-urbanized) areas must be submitted as part of a consolidated State proposal.
States and other eligible applicants also may submit consolidated proposals for projects in urbanized areas. The submission of the Statewide application will not preclude the submission and consideration of any application from other eligible recipients in an urbanized area in a State. Proposals may contain projects to be implemented by the recipient or its subrecipients.
Eligible subrecipients include public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, and private providers engaged in public transportation. Eligible applicants may submit consolidated proposals for projects. (2) Cost Sharing or Matching The maximum Federal share of project costs is 100 percent.
FTA may give additional consideration to applicants that propose a local share and may view these applicants as more competitive. The applicant must document the source(s) of the local match, if any, in the grant application. For any applicants proposing match, eligible local match sources include the following.
Cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from providing public transportation services. Revenues derived from the sale of advertising and concessions. Revenues generated from value capture financing mechanisms.
Funds from an undistributed cash surplus. Replacement or depreciation cash fund or reserve. New capital.
Or in-kind contributions. (3) Eligible Projects Eligible projects will propose innovative solutions to improve operational efficiencies of transit agencies and enhance the mobility of transit users, through projects that demonstrate innovative solutions for. Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis.
Exposure mitigation measures such a real-time notification of rail and bus passenger loads. New multi-modal payment innovative mobility systems such as contactless payments. And measures that strengthen public confidence in transit.
Each applicant may only submit one proposal.Start Printed Page 63655 D. Application and Submission Information (1) Address and Form of Application Submission Applications must be submitted through GRANTS.GOV. Applicants can find general information for submitting applications through GRANTS.GOV at www.fta.dot.gov/âhowtoapply, along with specific instructions for the forms and attachments required for submission.
Mail and fax submissions will not be accepted. (2) Content and Form of Application Submission a. Proposal Submission A complete proposal submission consists of at least two forms.
1. The SF-424 Mandatory Form (downloadable from GRANTS.GOV) and 2. The supplemental form for the FY 2020 erectile dysfunction treatment Demonstration Program (downloadable from GRANTS.GOV), which is available on FTA's website at (placeholder for FTA erectile dysfunction treatment Demonstration Program).
The application must include responses to all sections of the SF-424 mandatory form and the supplemental form unless a section is indicated as optional. FTA will use the information on the supplemental form to determine applicant and project eligibility for the program and to evaluate the proposal against the selection criteria described in part E of this notice. FTA will accept only one supplemental form per SF-424 submission.
FTA encourages applicants to consider submitting a single supplemental form that includes multiple activities to be evaluated as a consolidated proposal. Applicants may attach additional supporting information to the SF-424 submission, including but not limited to letters of support, project budgets, or excerpts from relevant planning documents. Supporting documentation must be described and referenced by file name in the appropriate response section of the supplemental form, or it may not be reviewed.
Information such as applicant name, Federal amount requested, local match amount, description of areas served, etc., may be requested in varying degrees of detail on both the SF-424 form and supplemental form. Applicants must fill in all fields unless stated otherwise on the forms. If applicants copy information into the supplemental form from another source, they should verify that the supplemental form has fully captured pasted text and that it has not truncated the text due to character limits built into the form.
Applicants should use both the âCheck Package for Errorsâ and the âValidate Formâ validation buttons on both forms to check all required fields. Applicants should also ensure that the Federal and local amounts specified are consistent. Addressing the deteriorating conditions and disproportionately high fatality rates on our rural transportation infrastructure is of critical interest to the Department, as rural transportation networks face unique challenges in safety, infrastructure condition, and passenger and freight usage.
Consistent with the R.O.U.T.E.S. Initiative, the Department encourages applicants to consider how the project will address the challenges faced by rural areas. B.
Application Content The SF-424 Mandatory Form and the supplemental form will prompt applicants for the required information, including. I. Applicant Name ii.
Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number iii. Key contact information (contact name, address, email address, and phone number) iv. Congressional district(s) where project will take place v.
Project Information (title, executive summary, and type) vi. A detailed description of the need for the project vii. A detailed description of how the project will support the Program objectives viii.
Evidence that the applicant can provide the local cost shares ix. A description of the technical, legal, and financial capacity of the applicant x. A detailed project budget xi.
Details on the local matching funds xii. A detailed project timeline xiii. Whether the project impacts an Opportunity Zone (3) Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) Each applicant is required to.
(1) Be registered in SAM before submitting an application. (2) provide a valid unique entity identifier in its application. And (3) continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which the applicant has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by FTA.
These requirements do not apply if the applicant. (1) Is excepted from the requirements under 2 CFR 25.110(b) or (c). Or (2) has an exception approved by FTA under 2 CFR 25.110(d).
FTA may not make an award until the applicant has complied with all applicable unique entity identifier and SAM requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time FTA is ready to make an award, FTA may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive an award and use that determination as a basis for making a Federal award to another applicant. All applicants must provide a unique entity identifier provided by SAM.
Registration in SAM may take as little as 3-5 business days, but there can be unexpected steps or delays. For example, the applicant may need to obtain an Employer Identification Number. FTA recommends allowing ample time, up to several weeks, to complete all steps.
For additional information on obtaining a unique entity identifier, please visit www.sam.gov. (4) Submission Dates and Times Project proposals must be submitted electronically through GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m. Eastern on November 2, 2020.
Mail and fax submissions will not be accepted. FTA urges applicants to submit applications at least 72 hours prior to the due date to allow time to correct any problems that may have caused either GRANTS.GOV or FTA systems to reject the submission. Proposals submitted after the deadline will only be considered under extraordinary circumstances not within the applicant's control.
Deadlines will not be extended due to scheduled website maintenance. GRANTS.GOV scheduled maintenance and outage times are announced on the GRANTS.GOV website. Within 48 hours after submitting an electronic application, the applicant should receive two email messages from GRANTS.GOV.
(1) Confirmation of successful transmission to GRANTS.GOV. And (2) confirmation of successful validation by GRANTS.GOV. If the applicant does not receive confirmation of successful validation or receives a notice of failed validation or incomplete materials, the applicant must address the reason for the failed validation, as described in the email notice, and resubmit before the submission deadline.
If making a resubmission for any reason, applicants must include all original attachments regardless of which attachments were updated and check the box on the supplemental form indicating this is a resubmission. Applicants are encouraged to begin the process of registration on the GRANTS.GOV site well in advance of the submission deadline. Registration is Start Printed Page 63656a multi-step process, which may take several weeks to complete before an application can be submitted.
Registered applicants may still be required to update their registration before submitting an application. Registration in SAM is renewed annually and persons making submissions on behalf of the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) must be authorized in GRANTS.GOV by the AOR to make submissions. (5) Funding Restrictions Funds may be used for post-award expenditures only.
Funds under this NOFO cannot be used to reimburse projects for otherwise eligible expenses incurred prior to the date of project award announcements. (6) Other Submission Requirements FTA encourages applicants to identify scaled funding options in case insufficient funding is available to fund a project at the full requested amount. If an applicant indicates that a project is scalable, the applicant must provide an appropriate minimum funding amount that will fund an eligible project that achieves the objectives of the program and meets all relevant program requirements.
The applicant must provide a clear explanation of how a reduced award would affect the project budget and scope. FTA may award a lesser amount whether or not the applicant provides a scalable option. E.
Application Review Information (1) Project Evaluation Criteria Addressing the deteriorating conditions and disproportionately high fatality rates on our rural transportation infrastructure is of critical interest to the Department, as rural transportation networks face unique challenges in safety, infrastructure condition, and passenger and freight usage. Consistent with the R.O.U.T.E.S. Initiative, the Department will consider how the project will address the challenges faced by rural areas.
In addition, the Department will review and consider applications for funding pursuant to this Notice in accordance with the President's September 2, 2020 memorandum, entitled Memorandum on Reviewing Funding to State and Local Government Recipients of Federal Funds that Are Permitting Anarchy, Violence, and Destruction in American Cities, consistent with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget and the Attorney General and with all applicable laws. FTA will evaluate proposals submitted according to the following criteria. (a) Project Innovation and Impact.
(b) Project Approach. (c) National Applicability. (d) Commercialization and/or Knowledge Transfer.
And (e) Technical, Legal and Financial Capacity. FTA encourages each applicant to demonstrate how a project supports all criteria with the most relevant information the applicant can provide, regardless of whether such information has been specifically requested or identified in this notice. A.
Project Innovation and Impact i. Effectiveness of the project in achieving and demonstrating the specific objectives of this program. Ii.
Demonstration of benefits in addressing the needs of the transit agency and industry and impacts to infrastructure, equipment, transit workforce, and riders. Iii. Degree of improvement over current and existing technologies, designs, and/or practices applicable to the transit industry.
B. Project Approach i. Quality of the project approach such as existing partnerships, collaboration strategies and level of commitment of the project partners.
Ii. Proposal is realistic in its approach to fulfill the milestones/deliverables, schedule and goals. C.
National Applicability i. Degree to which the project could be replicated by other transit agencies regionally or nationally. Ii.
Ability to evaluate technologies, designs and/or practices in a wide variety of conditions and locales. Iii. Degree to which the technology, designs and/or practices can be replicated by other transportation modes.
D. Commercialization and/or Knowledge Transfer i. Demonstrates a realistic plan for moving the results of the project into the transit marketplace (patents, conferences, articles in trade magazines, webinar, site visits, etc.).
Ii. How the project team plans to work with the industry on improving best practices, guidance and/or standards, if applicable. Iii.
Demonstrate a clear understanding and robust approach to data collection, access and management. E. Technical, Legal and Financial Capacity Capacity of the applicant and any partners to successfully execute the project effort.
There should be no outstanding legal, technical, or financial issues with the applicant that would make this a high-risk project. (2) Review and Selection Process An FTA technical evaluation committee will evaluate proposals based on the published project evaluation criteria. Members of the technical evaluation committee will rate the applications and may seek clarification about any statement in an application.
The FTA Administrator will determine the final selection and amount of funding for each project after consideration of the findings of the technical evaluation committee. Geographic diversity, diversity of the project type, the amount of local match to be provided, and the applicant's receipt and management of other Federal transit funds may be considered in FTA's award decisions. Prior fare payment innovation efforts may receive priority consideration.
The FTA Administrator will consider the following key DOT objectives. A. Utilizing alternative funding sources and innovative financing models to attract non-Federal sources of investment.
B. Whether the project is located in or supports public transportation service in a qualified opportunity zone designated pursuant to 26.U.S.C. 1400Z-1.
And c. The extent to which the project addresses challenges specific to the provision of rural public transportation. (3) FAPIIS Review Prior to making a grant award, FTA is required to review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) accessible through SAM.
An applicant may review and comment on information about itself that a Federal awarding agency previously entered. FTA will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2 CFR 200.205 Federal Awarding Agency Review of Risk Posed by Applicants. F.
Federal Award Administration Information (1) Federal Award Notices FTA will announce the final project selections on the FTA website. Project recipients should contact their FTA Regional Office for additional information regarding allocations for Start Printed Page 63657projects. At the time project selections are announced, FTA will extend pre-award authority for the selected projects.
There is no blanket pre-award authority for these projects before announcement. There is no minimum or maximum grant award amount, but FTA intends to fund as many meritorious projects as possible. FTA only will consider proposals from eligible recipients for eligible activities.
Due to funding limitations, projects selected for funding may receive less than the amount originally requested. In those cases, applicants must be able to demonstrate that the proposed projects are still viable and can be completed with the amount awarded. (2) Administrative and National Policy Requirements a.
Pre-Award Authority FTA will issue specific guidance to recipients regarding pre-award authority at the time of selection. FTA does not provide pre-award authority for competitive funds until projects are selected, and there are Federal requirements that must be met before costs are incurred. For more information about FTA's policy on pre-award authority, see the FY 2020 Apportionments Notice published on June 3, 2020, at https://www.govinfo.gov/âcontent/âpkg/âFR-2020-06-03/âpdf/â2020-11946.pdf.
b. Grant Requirements Selected applicants will submit a grant application through FTA's electronic grant management system and adhere to the customary FTA grant requirements for research project (insert Circular name). All competitive grants, regardless of award amount, will be subject to the Congressional notification and release process.
FTA emphasizes that third-party procurement applies to all funding awards, as described in FTA Circular 4220.1F, âThird Party Contracting Guidance.â However, FTA may approve applications that include a specifically identified partnering organization(s) (2 CFR 200.302(f)). When included, the application, budget, and budget narrative should provide a clear understanding of how the selection of these organizations is critical for the project and give sufficient detail about the costs involved. C.
Planning FTA encourages applicants to engage the appropriate State Departments of Transportation, Regional Transportation Planning Organizations, or Metropolitan Planning Organizations in areas to be served by the project funds available under this program. D. Standard Assurances The applicant assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, executive orders, FTA circulars, and other Federal administrative requirements in carrying out any project supported by the FTA grant.
The applicant acknowledges that it is under a continuing obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement issued for its project with FTA. The applicant understands that Federal laws, regulations, policies, and administrative practices might be modified from time to time and may affect the implementation of the project. The applicant agrees that the most recent Federal requirements will apply to the project unless FTA issues a written determination otherwise.
The applicant must submit the Certifications and Assurances before receiving a grant if it does not have current certifications on file. E. Free Speech and Religious Liberty In connection with any program or activity conducted with or benefiting from funds awarded under this notice, recipients of funds must comply with all applicable requirements of Federal law, including, without limitation, the Constitution of the United States.
Statutory, regulatory, and public policy requirements, including without limitation, those protecting free speech, religious liberty, public welfare, the environment, and prohibiting discrimination. The conditions of performance, non-discrimination requirements, and other assurances made applicable to the award of funds in accordance with regulations of the Department of Transportation. And applicable Federal financial assistance and contracting principles promulgated by the Office of Management and Budget.
In complying with these requirements, recipients must ensure that no concession agreements are denied or other contracting decisions made on the basis of speech or other activities protected by the First Amendment. If the Department determines that a recipient has failed to comply with applicable Federal requirements, the Department may terminate the award of funds and disallow previously incurred costs, requiring the recipient to reimburse any expended award funds. (3) Reporting The post-award reporting requirements include submission of the Federal Financial Report (FFR) and Milestone Progress Report in TrAMS.
An evaluation of the grant will occur at various points in the demonstration process and at the end of the project. In addition, FTA is responsible for producing an Annual Report to Congress that compiles evaluation of selected projects, including an evaluation of the performance measures identified by the applicants. All applicants must develop an evaluation plan to measure the success or failure of their projects and describe any plans for broad-based implementation of successful projects.
FTA may request data and reports to support the evaluation and Annual Report. A.
#ffffff. Color. #121212. Box-sizing. Border-box.
Calc(100% - 40px). Border-top. 5px solid #121212. Border-bottom. 2px solid #121212.
Padding. 5px 0 10px 0. } @media only screen and (min-width. 600px) { #styln-briefing-block { margin. 40px auto.
} } #styln-briefing-block a { color. #121212. } #styln-briefing-block ul { margin-left. 15px. } #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link { color.
#121212. Border-bottom. 1px solid #cccccc. Font-size. 0.9375rem.
Line-height. 1.375rem. } #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link:hover { border-bottom. None. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet::before { content.
-2px. Position. Relative. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet:not(:last-child) { margin-bottom. 0.75em.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header-section { margin-bottom. 16px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { font-weight. 700. Font-size.
1.125rem. Line-height. 1.375rem. Display. Inline-block.
Margin-bottom. 5px. } @media only screen and (min-width. 600px) { #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { font-size. 1.25rem.
Line-height. 1.5625rem. } } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header a { text-decoration. None. Color.
#333. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header a::after { content. 'âº'. Position. Relative.
Font-weight. 500. Margin-left. 5px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer { font-size.
14px. Margin-top. 1.25em. /* padding-top. 1.25em.
Border-top. 1px solid #e2e2e2. */ } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-briefinglinks a { font-weight. Bold. Margin-right.
6px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer a { border-bottom. 1px solid #ccc. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer a:hover { border-bottom. 1px solid transparent.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-header { border-bottom. None. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-lb-items { display. Grid. Grid-template-columns.
Auto 1fr. Grid-column-gap. 20px. Grid-row-gap. 15px.
Line-height. 1.2. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time a { color. #999. Font-size.
12px. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time.active a { color. #D0021B. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-footer-meta { display. None.
Justify-content. Space-between. Align-items. Center. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-ts { color.
} @media only screen and (min-width. 600px) { #styln-briefing-block a.briefing-block-link { font-size. 1.0625rem. Line-height. 1.5rem.
} #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-bullet::before { content. 'â¢'. Margin-right. 10px. Color.
Top. -2px. Position. Relative. } #styln-briefing-block .briefing-block-update-time a { font-size.
13px. } } @media only screen and (min-width. 1024px) { #styln-briefing-block { width. 100%. } } Latest Updates.
The erectile dysfunction Outbreak 38m ago Argentina, which had early success in controlling the levitra, reports its millionth case. 2h ago A third surge of erectile dysfunction s has now firmly taken hold across much of the United States. 2h ago All 62 residents of a Kansas nursing home caught the levitra in two weeks. See more updates More live coverage. Markets A New York Times database has tracked clusters of at least 50 erectile dysfunction cases in a dozen rural jails in Montana, Idaho, Utah and New Mexico during the levitra.
Among them. The Purgatory Correctional Center in Hurricane, Utah, with 166 s. The jail in Twin Falls, Idaho, with 279. And, in New Mexico, the Cibola County Correctional Center, which has reported 357 cases.In Cascade County, s at the jail make up about a quarter of all known levitra cases in the county. Health authorities say that the jailâs outbreak, which began in mid-August, was not believed to be the main cause of the communityâs recent surge, but that it had led to some cases.
In the past two months, Mr. Krogue said, the jail released 29 people who were considered actively infected.s at the jail make up about a quarter of Cascade Countyâs known levitra cases.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesGreat Falls, home to about 58,000 residents, is in the less mountainous part of Montana, with the Missouri River flowing through and a large oil refinery on its banks. The Cascade County Detention Center sits along a highway at the edge of town. Drive five miles in any direction and you are surrounded by wide-open plains.Montana requires that masks be worn inside businesses and indoor public spaces, and many people in Great Falls wear them when walking around downtownâs Central Avenue, where shops and cafes are still recovering from shutting down in the spring. Others go without masks, citing the open space and lack of crowds.Bob Kelly, the mayor, said people had not been overly worried about how the jail outbreak might affect the rest of town when it started.âI think that by the very definition of a jail, hopefully, the disease will be incarcerated, as well as the patients,â he said.
ÂIs there concern?. Sure, thereâs concern. But is there overreaction?. No.âThe mayor of Great Falls said that residents had considered the jailâs outbreak a distant concern at first.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesSome residentsâ nonchalance about the risks of the levitra, said Mr. Krogue, the jailâs medical director, can be traced to a spring and early summer when almost no one in Cascade County knew anyone who had been sickened.âWe benefited from that early on,â he said.
ÂBut in some ways, I think it did us a disservice, too, because it also created a certain level of complacency.âThat has quickly shifted now, he said, as cases have spiked.The number of active cases known to county officials on any given day has risen sharply to about 600, according to Trisha Gardner, Cascade Countyâs health officer. The county has seen 1,261 cases and six deaths during the levitra, a Times database shows. Some of the cases have been tied to the jail outbreak, she said, and others have been connected to bars and restaurants. Even figuring out what has led to some cases has been complex, she said, as residents have been reluctant to cooperate with contact tracers.âOur hospitals are at capacity, our public health system is at capacity,â she said. ÂItâs not sustainable at this rate.âWhen the outbreak at the jail began, social distancing was impossible, the authorities said.
Three inmates shared cells designed for two. At night, men slept on thin blue pads in every available space. On the floor in the day room, in shower stalls, in stairwells, in hallways outside of cells.Inmates did not receive masks until August, and jail officials said many have refused to wear them.In interviews with more than a dozen inmates and their family members, inmates described the jail during the outbreak as chaotic and unsanitary. They said their pleas for help often went unanswered by nurses and guards.Newly arriving inmates were not always quarantined from one another before their test results were known because of a lack of space, inmates and jail officials said.Owen Hawley, 30, said every inmate in his living area of 38 men had tested positive for the levitra. He said he had been unable to eat for three days, had intensive body aches and suffered from a headache so powerful it felt as if it was âbehind my eyes.ââAfter the fourth day of like, not eating and stuff, I just shut off, you know?.
 he said.A jail area set aside for quarantining new inmates.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesAt one point, Mr. Hawley said, he and other prisoners protested the way the levitra was being handled by refusing to leave their living areas and by blocking new inmates from entering. Everyone was ultimately tested, Mr. Hawley said, and each prisoner was given a disposable mask.Sierra Jasmine Wells, 25, another inmate, said women in her dormitory had grown ill, one after the next.âEveryone around me was getting sick and it was tough on me,â she said. ÂBy then, I had already accepted the fact that I was going to get sick.âWhen she became infected, she said, she was given cough syrup and Tylenol.âI kind of was just left alone to deal with it,â she said.Jesse Slaughter, the county sheriff who oversees the jail, said that the jailâs medical staff was doing everything it could, and that he had been seeking health care assistance from other counties.
Officials defended their handling of the outbreak, noting that all inmates received standard medications including Tylenol twice a day and were taken to area hospitals when they needed added care. Seven inmates, as well as some staff members, were hospitalized. No one from the jail has died from the levitra, officials said.Sheriff Jesse Slaughter, who oversees the jail, said he had been seeking health care assistance from other counties.Credit...Tailyr Irvine for The New York TimesMr. Krogue said that since the start of the outbreak he had been working up to 16 hours each day and sleeping in his basement, away from his wife and children. He remains healthy but says he fears bringing the levitra home.
The levitra has slowed some in the jail, and officials have moved some inmates to other facilities, but other prisons and jails in the state are now seeing outbreaks.âYou can start to see what some of these other places experienced much earlier on, and we just didnât have that experience, but itâs certainly happening now,â Mr. Krogue said. ÂItâs just real in a way that it wasnât.âLucy Tompkins reported from Great Falls, Maura Turcotte from Chicago and Libby Seline from Lincoln, Neb. Reporting was contributed by Izzy Colón from Columbia, Mo., Brendon Derr from Phoenix, Rebecca Griesbach from Tuscaloosa, Ala., Danya Issawi and Timothy Williams from New York, Ann Hinga Klein from Des Moines, K.B. Mensah from Silver Spring, Md., and Mitch Smith from Chicago.Start Preamble Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
Notice of funding opportunity. The erectile dysfunction Disease 2019 (erectile dysfunction treatment) public health emergency Start Printed Page 63654has had a significant impact on transit operations. During a series of FTA listening sessions held over the last three months, transit agencies asked FTA to support research to identify solutions to address the operational challenges that they are facing as a result of erectile dysfunction treatment. In response, FTA makes available through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) funding to support research demonstration grants to public transit agencies to develop, deploy, and demonstrate innovative solutions that improve the operational efficiency of transit agencies, as well as enhance the mobility of transit users affected by the erectile dysfunction treatment public health emergency. Demonstration grants under this NOFO are authorized under FTA's Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C.
5312). Eligible projects will demonstrate innovative solutions to improve the operational efficiencies of transit systems and enhance mobility for their communities in four major areas. (1) Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis. (2) exposure mitigation measures. (3) innovative mobility such as contactless payments.
And (4) measures that strengthen public confidence in transit services. The total funding available for awards under this NOFO is $10,000,000. FTA may supplement this amount if additional funding becomes available. Applicants must submit completed proposals for funding opportunity FTA-2020-015-TRI through the GRANTS.GOV âAPPLYâ function by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 2, 2020.
Prospective applicants should register as soon as possible on the GRANTS.GOV website to ensure they can complete the application process before the submission deadline. Application instructions are available on FTA's website at http://transit.dot.gov/âhowtoapply and in the âFINDâ module of GRANTS.GOV. FTA will not accept mail and fax submissions. Start Further Info Please send any questions on this notice to Jamel El-Hamri email. Jamel.El-Hamri@dot.gov phone.
2020-366-8985. A Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at 1-800-877-8339. End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information Table of Contents A. Program Description B. Federal Award Information C.
Eligibility Information D. Application and Submission Information E. Application Review Information F. Federal Award Administration Information G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact Information A.
Program Description The Public Transportation erectile dysfunction treatment Research Demonstration Grant Program is funded through the Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C. 5312), with the goal to develop, deploy, and demonstrate innovative solutions that improve the operational efficiency of transit agencies, as well as enhance the mobility of transit users affected by the erectile dysfunction treatment public health emergency. Eligible projects will propose to develop and deploy innovative solutions in four major areas. (1) Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis. (2) exposure mitigation measures.
(3) innovative mobility such as contactless payments. And (4) measures that strengthen public confidence in transit. As required by 49 U.S.C. 5312(e)(4), projects funded under this NOFO must participate in an evaluation by an independent outside entity that will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the success or failure of the projects funded under this subsection and any plan for broad-based implementation of the innovation promoted by successful projects. B.
Federal Award Information FTA makes available $10,000,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funds under the Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 U.S.C. 5312) to finance the Public Transportation erectile dysfunction treatment Research Demonstration Grant Program. FTA may supplement the total funds available if additional funding becomes available at the time project selections are made. FTA will grant pre-award authority starting on the date of the project award announcement for selected projects and should be completed within 24 months from the date of award. Funds are available only for eligible expenses incurred after the announcement of project selections.
C. Eligibility Information (1) Eligible Applicants Eligible applicants include State and local governmental authorities, direct recipients of Urbanized Area (49 U.S.C. 5307) and Rural Area (49 U.S.C. 5311) formula funds, and Indian tribes. Eligible applicants are limited to FTA grantees or subrecipients who would be the primary beneficiaries of the innovative products and services that are developedâtypically public transit agencies.
Except for projects proposed by Indian tribes, proposals for projects in rural (non-urbanized) areas must be submitted as part of a consolidated State proposal. States and other eligible applicants also may submit consolidated proposals for projects in urbanized areas. The submission of the Statewide application will not preclude the submission and consideration of any application from other eligible recipients in an urbanized area in a State. Proposals may contain projects to be implemented by the recipient or its subrecipients. Eligible subrecipients include public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, and private providers engaged in public transportation.
Eligible applicants may submit consolidated proposals for projects. (2) Cost Sharing or Matching The maximum Federal share of project costs is 100 percent. FTA may give additional consideration to applicants that propose a local share and may view these applicants as more competitive. The applicant must document the source(s) of the local match, if any, in the grant application. For any applicants proposing match, eligible local match sources include the following.
Cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from providing public transportation services. Revenues derived from the sale of advertising and concessions. Revenues generated from value capture financing mechanisms. Funds from an undistributed cash surplus. Replacement or depreciation cash fund or reserve.
New capital. Or in-kind contributions. (3) Eligible Projects Eligible projects will propose innovative solutions to improve operational efficiencies of transit agencies and enhance the mobility of transit users, through projects that demonstrate innovative solutions for. Vehicle, facility, equipment and infrastructure cleaning and dis. Exposure mitigation measures such a real-time notification of rail and bus passenger loads.
New multi-modal payment innovative mobility systems such as contactless payments. And measures that strengthen public confidence in transit. Each applicant may only submit one proposal.Start Printed Page 63655 D. Application and Submission Information (1) Address and Form of Application Submission Applications must be submitted through GRANTS.GOV. Applicants can find general information for submitting applications through GRANTS.GOV at www.fta.dot.gov/âhowtoapply, along with specific instructions for the forms and attachments required for submission.
Mail and fax submissions will not be accepted. (2) Content and Form of Application Submission a. Proposal Submission A complete proposal submission consists of at least two forms. 1. The SF-424 Mandatory Form (downloadable from GRANTS.GOV) and 2.
The supplemental form for the FY 2020 erectile dysfunction treatment Demonstration Program (downloadable from GRANTS.GOV), which is available on FTA's website at (placeholder for FTA erectile dysfunction treatment Demonstration Program). The application must include responses to all sections of the SF-424 mandatory form and the supplemental form unless a section is indicated as optional. FTA will use the information on the supplemental form to determine applicant and project eligibility for the program and to evaluate the proposal against the selection criteria described in part E of this notice. FTA will accept only one supplemental form per SF-424 submission. FTA encourages applicants to consider submitting a single supplemental form that includes multiple activities to be evaluated as a consolidated proposal.
Applicants may attach additional supporting information to the SF-424 submission, including but not limited to letters of support, project budgets, or excerpts from relevant planning documents. Supporting documentation must be described and referenced by file name in the appropriate response section of the supplemental form, or it may not be reviewed. Information such as applicant name, Federal amount requested, local match amount, description of areas served, etc., may be requested in varying degrees of detail on both the SF-424 form and supplemental form. Applicants must fill in all fields unless stated otherwise on the forms. If applicants copy information into the supplemental form from another source, they should verify that the supplemental form has fully captured pasted text and that it has not truncated the text due to character limits built into the form.
Applicants should use both the âCheck Package for Errorsâ and the âValidate Formâ validation buttons on both forms to check all required fields. Applicants should also ensure that the Federal and local amounts specified are consistent. Addressing the deteriorating conditions and disproportionately high fatality rates on our rural transportation infrastructure is of critical interest to the Department, as rural transportation networks face unique challenges in safety, infrastructure condition, and passenger and freight usage. Consistent with the R.O.U.T.E.S. Initiative, the Department encourages applicants to consider how the project will address the challenges faced by rural areas.
B. Application Content The SF-424 Mandatory Form and the supplemental form will prompt applicants for the required information, including. I. Applicant Name ii. Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number iii.
Key contact information (contact name, address, email address, and phone number) iv. Congressional district(s) where project will take place v. Project Information (title, executive summary, and type) vi. A detailed description of the need for the project vii. A detailed description of how the project will support the Program objectives viii.
Evidence that the applicant can provide the local cost shares ix. A description of the technical, legal, and financial capacity of the applicant x. A detailed project budget xi. Details on the local matching funds xii. A detailed project timeline xiii.
Whether the project impacts an Opportunity Zone (3) Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) Each applicant is required to. (1) Be registered in SAM before submitting an application. (2) provide a valid unique entity identifier in its application. And (3) continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which the applicant has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by FTA. These requirements do not apply if the applicant.
(1) Is excepted from the requirements under 2 CFR 25.110(b) or (c). Or (2) has an exception approved by FTA under 2 CFR 25.110(d). FTA may not make an award until the applicant has complied with all applicable unique entity identifier and SAM requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time FTA is ready to make an award, FTA may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive an award and use that determination as a basis for making a Federal award to another applicant. All applicants must provide a unique entity identifier provided by SAM.
Registration in SAM may take as little as 3-5 business days, but there can be unexpected steps or delays. For example, the applicant may need to obtain an Employer Identification Number. FTA recommends allowing ample time, up to several weeks, to complete all steps. For additional information on obtaining a unique entity identifier, please visit www.sam.gov. (4) Submission Dates and Times Project proposals must be submitted electronically through GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern on November 2, 2020. Mail and fax submissions will not be accepted. FTA urges applicants to submit applications at least 72 hours prior to the due date to allow time to correct any problems that may have caused either GRANTS.GOV or FTA systems to reject the submission. Proposals submitted after the deadline will only be considered under extraordinary circumstances not within the applicant's control. Deadlines will not be extended due to scheduled website maintenance.
GRANTS.GOV scheduled maintenance and outage times are announced on the GRANTS.GOV website. Within 48 hours after submitting an electronic application, the applicant should receive two email messages from GRANTS.GOV. (1) Confirmation of successful transmission to GRANTS.GOV. And (2) confirmation of successful validation by GRANTS.GOV. If the applicant does not receive confirmation of successful validation or receives a notice of failed validation or incomplete materials, the applicant must address the reason for the failed validation, as described in the email notice, and resubmit before the submission deadline.
If making a resubmission for any reason, applicants must include all original attachments regardless of which attachments were updated and check the box on the supplemental form indicating this is a resubmission. Applicants are encouraged to begin the process of registration on the GRANTS.GOV site well in advance of the submission deadline. Registration is Start Printed Page 63656a multi-step process, which may take several weeks to complete before an application can be submitted. Registered applicants may still be required to update their registration before submitting an application. Registration in SAM is renewed annually and persons making submissions on behalf of the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) must be authorized in GRANTS.GOV by the AOR to make submissions.
(5) Funding Restrictions Funds may be used for post-award expenditures only. Funds under this NOFO cannot be used to reimburse projects for otherwise eligible expenses incurred prior to the date of project award announcements. (6) Other Submission Requirements FTA encourages applicants to identify scaled funding options in case insufficient funding is available to fund a project at the full requested amount. If an applicant indicates that a project is scalable, the applicant must provide an appropriate minimum funding amount that will fund an eligible project that achieves the objectives of the program and meets all relevant program requirements. The applicant must provide a clear explanation of how a reduced award would affect the project budget and scope.
FTA may award a lesser amount whether or not the applicant provides a scalable option. E. Application Review Information (1) Project Evaluation Criteria Addressing the deteriorating conditions and disproportionately high fatality rates on our rural transportation infrastructure is of critical interest to the Department, as rural transportation networks face unique challenges in safety, infrastructure condition, and passenger and freight usage. Consistent with the R.O.U.T.E.S. Initiative, the Department will consider how the project will address the challenges faced by rural areas.
In addition, the Department will review and consider applications for funding pursuant to this Notice in accordance with the President's September 2, 2020 memorandum, entitled Memorandum on Reviewing Funding to State and Local Government Recipients of Federal Funds that Are Permitting Anarchy, Violence, and Destruction in American Cities, consistent with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget and the Attorney General and with all applicable laws. FTA will evaluate proposals submitted according to the following criteria. (a) Project Innovation and Impact. (b) Project Approach. (c) National Applicability.
(d) Commercialization and/or Knowledge Transfer. And (e) Technical, Legal and Financial Capacity. FTA encourages each applicant to demonstrate how a project supports all criteria with the most relevant information the applicant can provide, regardless of whether such information has been specifically requested or identified in this notice. A. Project Innovation and Impact i.
Effectiveness of the project in achieving and demonstrating the specific objectives of this program. Ii. Demonstration of benefits in addressing the needs of the transit agency and industry and impacts to infrastructure, equipment, transit workforce, and riders. Iii. Degree of improvement over current and existing technologies, designs, and/or practices applicable to the transit industry.
B. Project Approach i. Quality of the project approach such as existing partnerships, collaboration strategies and level of commitment of the project partners. Ii. Proposal is realistic in its approach to fulfill the milestones/deliverables, schedule and goals.
C. National Applicability i. Degree to which the project could be replicated by other transit agencies regionally or nationally. Ii. Ability to evaluate technologies, designs and/or practices in a wide variety of conditions and locales.
Iii. Degree to which the technology, designs and/or practices can be replicated by other transportation modes. D. Commercialization and/or Knowledge Transfer i. Demonstrates a realistic plan for moving the results of the project into the transit marketplace (patents, conferences, articles in trade magazines, webinar, site visits, etc.).
Ii. How the project team plans to work with the industry on improving best practices, guidance and/or standards, if applicable. Iii. Demonstrate a clear understanding and robust approach to data collection, access and management. E.
Technical, Legal and Financial Capacity Capacity of the applicant and any partners to successfully execute the project effort. There should be no outstanding legal, technical, or financial issues with the applicant that would make this a high-risk project. (2) Review and Selection Process An FTA technical evaluation committee will evaluate proposals based on the published project evaluation criteria. Members of the technical evaluation committee will rate the applications and may seek clarification about any statement in an application. The FTA Administrator will determine the final selection and amount of funding for each project after consideration of the findings of the technical evaluation committee.
Geographic diversity, diversity of the project type, the amount of local match to be provided, and the applicant's receipt and management of other Federal transit funds may be considered in FTA's award decisions. Prior fare payment innovation efforts may receive priority consideration. The FTA Administrator will consider the following key DOT objectives. A. Utilizing alternative funding sources and innovative financing models to attract non-Federal sources of investment.
B. Whether the project is located in or supports public transportation service in a qualified opportunity zone designated pursuant to 26.U.S.C. 1400Z-1. And c. The extent to which the project addresses challenges specific to the provision of rural public transportation.
(3) FAPIIS Review Prior to making a grant award, FTA is required to review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) accessible through SAM. An applicant may review and comment on information about itself that a Federal awarding agency previously entered. FTA will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2 CFR 200.205 Federal Awarding Agency Review of Risk Posed by Applicants. F. Federal Award Administration Information (1) Federal Award Notices FTA will announce the final project selections on the FTA website.
Project recipients should contact their FTA Regional Office for additional information regarding allocations for Start Printed Page 63657projects. At the time project selections are announced, FTA will extend pre-award authority for the selected projects. There is no blanket pre-award authority for these projects before announcement. There is no minimum or maximum grant award amount, but FTA intends to fund as many meritorious projects as possible. FTA only will consider proposals from eligible recipients for eligible activities.
Due to funding limitations, projects selected for funding may receive less than the amount originally requested. In those cases, applicants must be able to demonstrate that the proposed projects are still viable and can be completed with the amount awarded. (2) Administrative and National Policy Requirements a. Pre-Award Authority FTA will issue specific guidance to recipients regarding pre-award authority at the time of selection. FTA does not provide pre-award authority for competitive funds until projects are selected, and there are Federal requirements that must be met before costs are incurred.
For more information about FTA's policy on pre-award authority, see the FY 2020 Apportionments Notice published on June 3, 2020, at https://www.govinfo.gov/âcontent/âpkg/âFR-2020-06-03/âpdf/â2020-11946.pdf. b. Grant Requirements Selected applicants will submit a grant application through FTA's electronic grant management system and adhere to the customary FTA grant requirements for research project (insert Circular name). All competitive grants, regardless of award amount, will be subject to the Congressional notification and release process. FTA emphasizes that third-party procurement applies to all funding awards, as described in FTA Circular 4220.1F, âThird Party Contracting Guidance.â However, FTA may approve applications that include a specifically identified partnering organization(s) (2 CFR 200.302(f)).
When included, the application, budget, and budget narrative should provide a clear understanding of how the selection of these organizations is critical for the project and give sufficient detail about the costs involved. C. Planning FTA encourages applicants to engage the appropriate State Departments of Transportation, Regional Transportation Planning Organizations, or Metropolitan Planning Organizations in areas to be served by the project funds available under this program. D. Standard Assurances The applicant assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, executive orders, FTA circulars, and other Federal administrative requirements in carrying out any project supported by the FTA grant.
The applicant acknowledges that it is under a continuing obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement issued for its project with FTA. The applicant understands that Federal laws, regulations, policies, and administrative practices might be modified from time to time and may affect the implementation of the project. The applicant agrees that the most recent Federal requirements will apply to the project unless FTA issues a written determination otherwise. The applicant must submit the Certifications and Assurances before receiving a grant if it does not have current certifications on file. E.
Free Speech and Religious Liberty In connection with any program or activity conducted with or benefiting from funds awarded under this notice, recipients of funds must comply with all applicable requirements of Federal law, including, without limitation, the Constitution of the United States. Statutory, regulatory, and public policy requirements, including without limitation, those protecting free speech, religious liberty, public welfare, the environment, and prohibiting discrimination. The conditions of performance, non-discrimination requirements, and other assurances made applicable to the award of funds in accordance with regulations of the Department of Transportation. And applicable Federal financial assistance and contracting principles promulgated by the Office of Management and Budget. In complying with these requirements, recipients must ensure that no concession agreements are denied or other contracting decisions made on the basis of speech or other activities protected by the First Amendment.
If the Department determines that a recipient has failed to comply with applicable Federal requirements, the Department may terminate the award of funds and disallow previously incurred costs, requiring the recipient to reimburse any expended award funds.